Bug 111200

Summary: Some documents not appearing in yelp
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Walton <mrjwalton>
Component: yelpAssignee: Alexander Larsson <alexl>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: 2.4.0-2 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-12-24 09:29:25 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Description Flags
Patch none

Description Michael Walton 2003-11-29 18:57:39 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1)

Description of problem:
Some documents, which are in the index, do not appear when I try to
read then. Instead, I see end up seeing a message like:

The info document "pcl-cvs" could not be found. It may have been
removed from your system. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start yelp.
2. Click on the "Index" button on the upper button panel. 
3. Enter "pcl-cvs" in the "Search for:" text field.
4. In the list pane in the left a line with "pcl-cvs" should have
appeared. Click on that line.


Actual Results:  The following message will appear in the text panel
(where documents are displayed):

The info document "pcl-cvs" could not be found. It may have been
removed from your system. 

Expected Results:  The pcl-cvs info document should have come up.

Additional info:

The pcl-cvs info document is included in the distribution, because
typing "info pcl-cvs" is a way of seeing the pcl-cvs info document.
Comment 1 Miloslav Trmac 2003-12-01 07:43:07 EST
Created attachment 96258 [details]

This is an "obviously correct" patch, already in upstream CVS.
Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2003-12-24 09:29:25 EST
Fixed package built as 2.4.0-2.
Comment 3 Rob Riggs 2004-02-05 00:57:36 EST
Can we get this package pushed into FC1?