Bug 1112409
| Summary: | fedora-review claims that python dirs are unowned | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jerry James <loganjerry> |
| Component: | fedora-review | Assignee: | Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | leamas.alec, pingou, sochotni |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 12:10:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Unfortunately, the directory ownership are not complete for performance reasons. That said, f-r does *not* complain about unowned directories, it just says it does not have a known owner i. e., that the ownership should be checked manually. So, this is not a bug and I'm closing it as such. Yes, to do a complete, fully recursive ownership check would be nice if performance allowed. Perhaps it might make sense to check of the new depsolver is fast enough to make this feasible. Thanks for reporting! |
Description of problem: In recent reviews, fedora-review has been issuing complaints like this: [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages, /usr/lib64/python3.4, /usr/include/python3.4m [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.4/site- packages, /usr/lib64/python3.4, /usr/include/python2.7, /usr/include/python3.4m All of those directories are owned by python-libs or python3-libs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-review-0.5.1-2.fc20.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run fedora-review on a package such as the one in bug 1102950 2. 3. Actual results: Fedora-review complains about unowned directories that are, in fact, owned by the python-libs or python3-libs packages. Expected results: No such complaints. Additional info: