Bug 1113185

Summary:	PRD35 - [RFE] NFS custom mountoptions
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Aharon Canan <acanan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.5.0	CC:	bazulay, fsimonce, gklein, iheim, lpeer, mgoldboi, mst, rbalakri, scohen, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	3.5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	storage
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Previously, users who wanted to take advantage of specific mount options their storage array supported could only define a POSIX domain, thus losing the enhancements Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization provides for NFS. With this release, it is now possible to specify custom mount options for NFS storage domains.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1087059	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-11 21:11:47 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1087059
Bug Blocks:	1057043, 1142923, 1156165

Description Allon Mureinik 2014-06-25 15:06:58 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1087059 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1057043 +++

Various storage providers allow enhancements for NFS mounts with specific mount options (e.g., see bug 1057043). 
This RFE is a the minimal requirement, to allow passing custom option from the GUI/REST all the way down to the mount command VDSM executes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a clone for tracking the inclusion of the RFE in RHEV.

Comment 3 Aharon Canan 2014-08-27 16:11:12 UTC

following my discussion with Sean - looks like we need to understand how to handle multiple nfs versions (please check bug 1129597)

Comment 4 Aharon Canan 2014-09-03 10:15:49 UTC

Waiting for the patched for blocking dual values through the advanced mount options

Comment 5 Allon Mureinik 2014-09-03 13:19:55 UTC

This is absolutely no reason to move fail qa - there's a a well documented gap (of a completely uninteresting usecase).
If you want to wait till the this is delivered, that's fine.

Comment 7 Aharon Canan 2014-09-14 07:13:56 UTC

verified using vt2.2

https://tcms.engineering.redhat.com/run/175846/

please be aware to the bugs below - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141499
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141500

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-02-11 21:11:47 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0159.html