Bug 1113413
Summary: | suricata packaging issues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
Component: | suricata | Assignee: | Steve Grubb <sgrubb> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 22 | CC: | athmanem, sgrubb |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-19 11:50:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 504493 |
Description
Christopher Meng
2014-06-26 07:17:12 UTC
Thanks for the review. 1) changed. 2) There is a bz asking for EPEL, so I'm leaving it. I'll potentially fix item #3 if/when I fix EPEL support. 3) For years the bundled version was the only supported one. It was documented that if you use anything else, you are on your own. The bundled one is the only one that is QA'ed. Not sure the suricata project has reached a point where they are ready for any random version of libhtp or they would have dropped the bundled library completely. I'm inclined to leave as is for now and start a discussion upstream about the topic. 4) it used to be more than pointing to a web site. deleted. 5) fixed 6) fixed 7) All I saw was Requires(*) that needed fixing. If you see something else, please be more specific. 8) spatch is for QA testing. We don't use it. Added --disable-coccinelle to make it clear 9) It seems to work. If there was a bug reported against lua I could look at changing to the compat library 10) doxygen is not needed I don't see anything reported important enough to recall the current update. So, I will only check this into the master branch and f20 can pick it up on the next upstream update. 2.0.2-2 is now in koji. Thanks. (In reply to Steve Grubb from comment #1) > 3) For years the bundled version was the only supported one. It was > documented that if you use anything else, you are on your own. The bundled > one is the only one that is QA'ed. Not sure the suricata project has reached > a point where they are ready for any random version of libhtp or they would > have dropped the bundled library completely. I'm inclined to leave as is for > now and start a discussion upstream about the topic. From the website I can see that it mentions the external dependency with version specified, doesn't it indicated that you could have a try? Any way, it's right, we need to get an answer from upstream first. And, if FESCo has granted such exception, an appropriate Provides: should be in the spec as well. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |