Bug 1115087

Summary: Upgrade to HornetQ 2.3.20.Final from 2.3.19.Final-redhat-1
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Reporter: Kabir Khan <kkhan>
Component: HornetQAssignee: Clebert Suconic <csuconic>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Miroslav Novak <mnovak>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Russell Dickenson <rdickens>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3.0CC: chaowan, csuconic, dosoudil, msvehla, myarboro
Target Milestone: ER9   
Target Release: EAP 6.3.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-06 14:35:42 UTC Type: Component Upgrade
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1104852, 1106730    
Bug Blocks: 1102552, 1105081    

Description Kabir Khan 2014-07-01 14:20:13 UTC
HornetQ needs to be recompiled against the netty version in the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114918 upgrade, needed for the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092797 blocker.

Comment 1 Clebert Suconic 2014-07-01 15:06:59 UTC
You would also see two committs adding hornetq-tools folder on this release, which won't affect any of the jars. It's an addition that has been helping us to deal with support cases.

hornetq-tools at the moment is a tool for ourselves, which we eventually send to customers to perform tasks, but it's not part of the distribution whatsoever. 

It doesn't affect anything on the release. Please let the hornetq-tools stay on our source code, but don't use it for anything on the distribution.

Comment 2 Clebert Suconic 2014-07-01 15:20:35 UTC
Tagged at HornetQ_2_3_20_Final

Comment 3 Kabir Khan 2014-07-01 16:08:07 UTC
Setting back to qa_ack+ since the reset to ? seems to have been done by the bot

Comment 5 Kabir Khan 2014-07-02 08:28:46 UTC
The 6.3.0 Netty upgrade BZ is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102552 not 1114918 as I originally put it.

Comment 6 Martin Svehla 2014-07-07 07:45:15 UTC
Verified in EAP 6.3.0.ER9

Comment 7 Carlo de Wolf 2014-07-14 13:10:27 UTC
*** Bug 1105076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***