Bug 111536

Summary: please add cryptoloop glue patch
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: James Ralston <ralston>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1CC: herrold, moneta.mace
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-04-09 11:11:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 56698    

Description James Ralston 2003-12-04 22:52:13 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1)
Gecko/20030225

Description of problem:
Although the CryptoAPI patch has been officially integrated into the
Linux kernel, the glue code needed for encrypted loopback support was
omitted.

While I suspect that the cryptoloop glue patch will probably be
integrated upstream, until that happens, anyone who needs encrypted
loopback support must manually build their own kernels.

This patch is the simplest (i.e., least backward-compatible with the
old kerneli patch) way to add the cryptoloop glue:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/crypto/v2.4/testing/patch-cryptoloop-hvr-2.4.22.0

Would integrating this patch into the Fedora kernel be reasonable?

Note that I've done most of the work for you:

http://www.pobox.com/~ralston/dev/


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl

Comment 1 W. Michael Petullo 2003-12-06 03:36:00 UTC
For what its worth, Cryptoloop (and CryptoAPI) are both included in
the standard Linux 2.6-testX kernel.

Comment 2 W. Michael Petullo 2004-02-12 17:00:53 UTC
Util-linux 2.12 is also required.  See also bug #56698.  This bug
exists in Fedora Core 2 Test 1 because util-linux 2.12pre3 does not
have the newest cryptoloop support.

Comment 3 W. Michael Petullo 2004-02-17 16:31:40 UTC
The util-linux included in rawhide now contains full cryptoloop
support (see the resolved bug #56698).  Does the 2.6 kernel in rawhide
contain a working cryptoloop yet?  I use a custom PowerPC kernel, so I
can't easily test this.

Comment 4 James Ralston 2004-04-09 11:11:29 UTC
Actually, as far as I've been able to tell, the 2.6 kernels do NOT
contain a working cryptoloop.  But since the crytoloop interface has
been deprecated anyway (see bug 56698 and bug 120487), it's
irrelevant, so I'm closing this bug.

(I always find it amusing when bugs are opened, discussed, and then
eventually closed without any involvement from Red Hat. ;)