Bug 1116560
Summary: | Review Request: shelxle - Qt graphical user interface for SHELXL | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | david, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-08-10 00:49:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Christopher Meng
2014-07-06 10:36:25 UTC
Missing kissfftw library in Fedora, bundled now. Theres something wrong with the SRPM: cpio: premature end of file WARNING: Cannot unpack /export/home/dnichols/fr/shelxle-1.0.663-1.fc21.src.rpm into /export/home/dnichols/fr/review-shelxle/srpm-unpacked can you please check it? (In reply to David Nichols from comment #2) > Theres something wrong with the SRPM: > > cpio: premature end of file > WARNING: Cannot unpack > /export/home/dnichols/fr/shelxle-1.0.663-1.fc21.src.rpm into > /export/home/dnichols/fr/review-shelxle/srpm-unpacked > > can you please check it? I know... It's corrupt now, I have problem with connection here. I will upload again later. Anyway, it's "NotReady" in Whiteboard field, as it bundles kissfft, I'm seeking the solution now. Thanks. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |