Bug 1117998

Summary:	puppet bug # 17493 back port to RHOSP
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Jeff Dexter <jdexter>
Component:	facter	Assignee:	Martin Magr <mmagr>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ami Jeain <ajeain>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0	CC:	aberezin, benglish, calba, dnavale, yeylon
Target Milestone:	z5	Keywords:	Rebase, ZStream
Target Release:	4.0
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	facter-1.7.4-1.el6	Doc Type:	Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:	The package facter has been rebased to version: 1.7.4-1 The following bug has been fixed with this rebase: * Issues with puppet runs on OpenStack Compute nodes.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-10-22 18:28:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeff Dexter 2014-07-09 19:25:58 UTC

1. Proposed title of this feature request
puppet bug # 17493 back port to RHOSP

2. Who is the customer behind the request?
Account: name (acct #) Telefonica Digital| 5231859
TAM customer: yes
SRM customer: yes
Strategic: yes

3. What is the nature and description of the request?
Customer is hitting puppet bug 17493 (http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/17493)
This bug's fix was highlighted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871211, and is currently fixed in factor-1.6.18-3.el6 in EPEL Customer would like to have this fix brought into the version of factor used in RHOSP
4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer uses facter for other buisness needs and is not able to use the epel version since they are running foreman
5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
backport fix into factor used in RHOSP
6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Running facter --debug
7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?
Yes http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/17493 / https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871211
8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)?
RHOSP 4.0z
9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
no
10. List any affected packages or components.
no
11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?
yes

Comment 2 Martin Magr 2014-07-15 09:17:58 UTC

Successfully tested RHELOSP-4 with facter-1.7.4-1.el6.x86_64.rpm, so we can update it to the same version which we have in RHELOSP-5.

Comment 4 Ami Jeain 2014-10-14 13:38:51 UTC

verified in Havana using the latest facter version :
# rpm -q facter
facter-1.7.4-1.el6.x86_64

ran basic sanity on nova (booted an instance)

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-22 18:28:17 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1696.html