Bug 1118181
Summary: | restructure cache stores chapter | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Data Grid 6 | Reporter: | Misha H. Ali <mhusnain> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Misha H. Ali <mhusnain> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.3.0 | CC: | dmehra, jdg-bugs, jmarkos |
Target Milestone: | GA | ||
Target Release: | 6.4.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: |
Build Name: 12532, Administration and Configuration Guide-6.3
Build Date: 10-07-2014 16:31:26
Topic IDs:
5399-621933 [Latest]
|
|
Last Closed: | 2014-11-18 23:33:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Misha H. Ali
2014-07-10 07:12:15 UTC
Working on this now. Updated all topics in the cache store chapter and removed the repeated configurations. Hi Jakub, First, a quick refresher on what the intended fix was. Each configuration sample in the cache stores chapter had multiple steps, where each step would add a configuration element, detail its parameters and what they do, their defaults values, etc. and then the final step would have the finalized configuration sample. I merged all of these so that there is now only one configuration sample with details about it following. You raised a good point about the details for each element and parameter after can also be minimized. I'll get on this today and have something for you to look at as soon as possible. Reintegrated changes to main doc. Jakub, could you take out some time and have a look and let me know if the consolidation is sufficiently better now? Thanks, Jakub. I think in all the confusion implementing the restructure and then reverting it the change was lost. I'm implementing the above and setting this back to verification shortly. Thanks, verified! The fix for this bug is now available on access.redhat.com |