Bug 1119120
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-DNS-EtcHosts - Perl module to use /etc/hosts before DNS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ddick, didiksupriadi41, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-10-02 00:45:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 201449, 1119118 | ||
|
Description
Christopher Meng
2014-07-14 05:04:42 UTC
License is correct. Builds cleanly in rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7136611 Add the following BRs BR perl(AnyEvent::DNS) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 56 BR perl(AnyEvent::Socket) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 59 BR perl(AnyEvent::Util) # t/200_socket.t at line 37 BR perl(base) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 56 BR perl(Carp) # t/100_dns.t at line 6 BR perl(Config) # Build.PL at line 11 BR perl(constant) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 61 BR perl(if) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 62 BR perl(lib) # Build.PL at line 6 BR perl(strict) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 51 BR perl(warnings) # lib/AnyEvent/DNS/EtcHosts.pm at line 52 rpmlint reports ok. Just a ping on these ones? This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |