Bug 1119872
Summary: | libosinfo.org website: old version specified on the download page | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Virtualization Tools | Reporter: | Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy> |
Component: | libosinfo | Assignee: | Zeeshan Ali <zeenix> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | berrange, cfergeau, fidencio, mclasen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-07-21 13:42:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Roman Bogorodskiy
2014-07-15 17:30:06 UTC
I really don't think its a good idea to add info for each release on the website. We can just link to the download directory, otherwise we always forgot to update the website. I'm fine with this approach as well, my main concern was the confusing version provided. (In reply to Roman Bogorodskiy from comment #2) > I'm fine with this approach as well, my main concern was the confusing > version provided. You'll be confused very often with this approach. :) Sooo.. could we just drop this 0.2.8 version link as you said and say 'grab the latest release here: <directory link> and check the maillist for announces' or something like that? (In reply to Roman Bogorodskiy from comment #4) > Sooo.. could we just drop this 0.2.8 version link as you said and say 'grab > the latest release here: <directory link> and check the maillist for > announces' or something like that? Yes. I failed to find how to modify the sidebar so I edited the downloads page. Thanks! |