Bug 1121416

Summary:	/usr/share/licenses
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Remi Collet <fedora>
Component:	filesystem	Assignee:	Ondrej Vasik <ovasik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	19	CC:	ovasik, rc040203
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	filesystem-3.2-28.fc21	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-12-06 10:26:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Remi Collet 2014-07-20 15:49:03 UTC

Description of problem:
file /usr/share/licenses is not owned by any package


Usage of %license start to grow, resulting of lot of files in an unowned dir.

I think /usr/share/licenses should be owned by filesystem (as /usr/share/doc).


Notice, as lot of maintainers keep the same spec file in all branches, nice to have it fixed in F19+ (all versions where %license work)

Comment 1 Ondrej Vasik 2014-07-20 19:25:55 UTC

Yes, /usr/share/licenses ownership makes sense, thanks for heads-up.

Comment 2 Ondrej Vasik 2014-10-03 12:43:23 UTC

Closing Rawhide for now - it's done there since late July, will probably do a bodhi update for F19/F20/F21 to include more changes there.

Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2014-11-18 05:59:41 UTC

Reopening.

/usr/share/licenses is unowned in fedora 21

Comment 4 Ondrej Vasik 2014-11-18 12:30:27 UTC

Yes, I said Rawhide and late July, no word about Fedora 21 in my comment #2... However, it probably make sense to do the change there... Will do an update in bodhi.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2014-11-18 12:55:52 UTC

filesystem-3.2-28.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/filesystem-3.2-28.fc21

Comment 6 Ralf Corsepius 2014-11-18 13:24:45 UTC

(In reply to Ondrej Vasik from comment #4)
> Yes, I said Rawhide and late July, no word about Fedora 21 in my comment
> #2... However, it probably make sense to do the change there... Will do an
> update in bodhi.

I could have filed a new BZ, instead.

(In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #5)
> filesystem-3.2-28.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/filesystem-3.2-28.fc21

Thanks, ... one unowned directory less - There probably are 100s more ;)

Comment 7 Ondrej Vasik 2014-11-18 14:59:29 UTC

And similar numbers of duplicate ownerships - sometimes even breaking installations (when the file access rights do differ). ;)
Sorry for not doing the update sooner, it just got off my todo-next-day. Now, it will not end-up on the ISOs for F21... but not a big deal.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-11-19 03:09:25 UTC

Package filesystem-3.2-28.fc21:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing filesystem-3.2-28.fc21'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15360/filesystem-3.2-28.fc21
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-12-06 10:26:40 UTC

filesystem-3.2-28.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.