Bug 1123190
Summary: | rsyslogd-2177: imjournal: begin to drop messages due to rate-limiting | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | customercare |
Component: | systemd | Assignee: | systemd-maint |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 20 | CC: | ask, bugzilla.redhat.com, johannbg, lnykryn, msekleta, s, systemd-maint, vpavlin, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-06-29 21:44:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
customercare
2014-07-25 05:26:00 UTC
Workaround to stop it : edit /etc/systemd/journald.conf alter MaxRetentionSec to : "MaxRetentionSec=10day" systemctl restart systemd-journald After a few secs the output stops and the syslogd returns to normal operations. As a positive sideeffect: i got rid of 3 GB of unneeded logfiles :) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Addiotion comment: The questions remains: why did systemd-journald send all the old log entries to syslogd in the first place ? First they made rsyslog the default instead of syslog-ng and then they imposed the crazy systemd journal on us. I can't imagine what will come next to make it worse again, but I'm sure something will come up! I have the same problem; I don't know that I want to not have old logs in the journal but it sure is annoying to have it spewed to the remote syslog server again and again. "$IMUXSockRateLimitInterval 0" seems to stop this particular kind of rate limiting. I'm adding it here since this was what I came to the ticket to look for. imjournal reading the same stuff again and again from the journal might be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974132 This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '20'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |