Bug 1123492
Summary: | NetworkManager must be disabled in staypuft deployments | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars> |
Component: | rhel-osp-installer | Assignee: | Mike Burns <mburns> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Toni Freger <tfreger> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | ajeain, amuller, breeler, lars, mburns, rhos-maint, sclewis, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | ga | ||
Target Release: | Installer | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | rhel-osp-installer-0.1.6-3.el6ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
In some deployment scenarios, puppet configures a NIC as part of a bridge. As a consequence, if NetworkManager is running, this change causes the puppet agent to terminate when the NIC being changed is the one in use.
This has been fixed by disabling NetworkManager, so now puppet-runs no longer get killed mid-run as a result of a valid configuration change.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-08-21 18:06:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2014-07-25 20:01:36 UTC
And with NetworkManager disabled, br-ex gets configured correctly and the deploy continues successfully: Jul 25 20:16:24 mac52540036b16c.localdomain ovs-vsctl[11132]: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as /usr/bin/ovs-vsctl add-br br-ex Jul 25 20:16:24 mac52540036b16c.localdomain kernel: device br-ex entered promiscuous mode Jul 25 20:16:24 mac52540036b16c.localdomain puppet-agent[1969]: (/Stage[main]/Neutron::Agents::Ovs/Neutron::Plugins::Ovs::Bridge[physnet-external:br-ex]/Vs_bridge[br-ex]/ensure) created Jul 25 20:16:25 mac52540036b16c.localdomain ovs-vsctl[11149]: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as /usr/bin/ovs-vsctl add-port br-ex eth0 Jul 25 20:16:25 mac52540036b16c.localdomain kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Jul 25 20:16:26 mac52540036b16c.localdomain ovs-vsctl[11244]: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl -t 10 -- --if-exists del-port br-ex eth0 Jul 25 20:16:26 mac52540036b16c.localdomain kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Jul 25 20:16:27 mac52540036b16c.localdomain ovs-vsctl[11300]: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl -t 10 -- --if-exists del-br br-ex Jul 25 20:16:27 mac52540036b16c.localdomain kernel: device br-ex left promiscuous mode Jul 25 20:16:27 mac52540036b16c.localdomain ovs-vsctl[11334]: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl -t 10 -- --may-exist add-br br-ex -- set bridge br-ex other-config:hwaddr=52:54:00:36:b1:6c Jul 25 20:16:27 mac52540036b16c.localdomain kernel: device br-ex entered promiscuous mode Jul 25 20:16:28 mac52540036b16c.localdomain ovs-vsctl[11394]: ovs|00001|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl -t 10 -- --may-exist add-port br-ex eth0 Jul 25 20:16:28 mac52540036b16c.localdomain kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Jul 25 20:16:28 mac52540036b16c.localdomain dhclient[11419]: DHCPDISCOVER on br-ex to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3 (xid=0x40c1bfaf) Jul 25 20:16:28 mac52540036b16c.localdomain dhclient[11419]: DHCPREQUEST on br-ex to 255.255.255.255 port 67 (xid=0x40c1bfaf) Jul 25 20:16:28 mac52540036b16c.localdomain dhclient[11419]: DHCPOFFER from 172.16.0.1 Jul 25 20:16:28 mac52540036b16c.localdomain dhclient[11419]: DHCPACK from 172.16.0.1 (xid=0x40c1bfaf) Jul 25 20:16:30 mac52540036b16c.localdomain NET[11464]: /usr/sbin/dhclient-script : updated /etc/resolv.conf Jul 25 20:16:30 mac52540036b16c.localdomain dhclient[11419]: bound to 172.16.0.6 -- renewal in 296 seconds. NetworkManager is down as expected. ruby193-rubygem-staypuft-0.1.22.el6ost This bug is only relevant when you use the same NIC for both provisioning and external access, correct? Also, with NM off, before the puppet run, eth0 has an IP address, and when the run finishes that IP is on br-ex? This is not the case with NM on? If you would run with NM on and SSH into the machine on a different NIC, would br-ex end up with an IP or not? Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1090.html |