Bug 1123923

Summary: [RFE] katello-installer --katello-proxy-* configuration should be derived from /etc/rhsm/rhsm.conf
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Sebastian Hetze <shetze>
Component: InstallationAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0.3CC: bbuckingham, bkearney, chrobert, kabbott, mgazdik, mmccune, pmoravec, rjerrido, shughes, stbenjam, taw, xdmoon
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, PrioBumpGSS, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-09 21:05:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1115190    

Description Sebastian Hetze 2014-07-28 15:56:19 UTC
If the Satellite-6 server is running behind a firewall that requires proxy configuration for RHN/CDN access, this configuration is already present for the subscription-manager config in /etc/rhsm/rhsm.conf

If present, katello-installer should use these settings as default for setting up katello and pulp.

An additional katello-installer parameter "--ignore-rhsm-proxy-config" should be addet to override this behaviour.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-07-28 16:04:14 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 6 Karl Abbott 2015-01-27 12:59:42 UTC
Now that we are post-GA of Satellite 6, can we get a re-review for when this may be added to the product?

Cheers,
Karl

Comment 7 Xixi 2015-01-27 17:12:57 UTC
(In reply to Karl J. Abbott from comment #6)
> Now that we are post-GA of Satellite 6, can we get a re-review for when this
> may be added to the product?

Can do Karl - do you have a customer impact statement to help prioritize this?

Comment 13 Todd Warner 2017-02-09 21:05:11 UTC
The age and prioritization of this request ensures that it was not something we could address in any meaningful timeframe. Closing this bugzilla. If you feel that we made this decision in error or this issue is particularly important to you, please feel free to reopen it.

-todd warner, PM, Satellite