Bug 1125046

Summary: Disaster Recovery for Capsule Satellite Server
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Athene Chan <achan>
Component: Docs User GuideAssignee: David O'Brien <daobrien>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Peter Ondrejka <pondrejk>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: UnspecifiedCC: andrew.schofield, bkearney, daobrien, greartes, mmccune, mmurray, xdmoon
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-22 01:22:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1115190, 1179535, 1425213    
Deadline: 2015-04-03   

Description Athene Chan 2014-07-31 00:25:16 UTC
From bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123883

DR / Recovery. How do you DR a satellite server? What if a capsule blows up? - Can you DR these? How do you rebuild one and have the clients restore their connections without intervention.

After consultation with the developer team, I have moved this chunk of request out of the original bug as this can only be addressed in 6.1.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-07-31 00:33:51 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 3 Athene Chan 2014-07-31 02:53:03 UTC
Hello Andrew,

I am adding you to the cc list as this section of your request for documentation will have to be addressed in a future release of the Red Hat Satellite 6 books. Keeping you in cc will help us update you when we've tackled this issue.

Cheers,
Athene

Comment 6 Athene Chan 2014-09-19 00:47:42 UTC
*** Bug 1136576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 RHEL Program Management 2015-04-21 16:11:02 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.