Bug 1125968

Summary: [abrt] 'dnf builddep' throws backtrace on missing signature
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Benedikt Morbach <bmorbach>
Component: dnf-plugins-coreAssignee: Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: akozumpl, jsilhan, packaging-team-maint, pknirsch, pnemade, rholy, tim.lauridsen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-19 09:20:16 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Benedikt Morbach 2014-08-01 13:22:28 UTC 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/dnf", line 36, in <module>
    main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 200, in user_main
    errcode = main(args)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 83, in main
    return _main(base, args)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 133, in _main
    cli.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 1171, in run
    return self.command.run(self.base.extcmds)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 52, in inner
    return func(*args, **kwds)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 110, in run
    self._src_deps(rpm_ts, fn)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 75, in _src_deps
    h = rpm_ts.hdrFromFdno(fd)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/rpm/transaction.py", line 156, in hdrFromFdno
    raise rpm.error("public key not available")
_rpm.error: public key not available


I think it should set
    ts._vsflags = rpm._RPMVSF_NOSIGNATURES
to read the srpm, as it doesn't install anything.
(assuming that is the correct way to set that flag, the underscore looks dodgy)

I may be missing some security implications here though?
Comment 1 Honza Silhan 2014-08-22 13:02:56 UTC 
Hi, thanks for the report. We'll take a look. I think you are right with the missing flag.
Comment 3 Ales Kozumplik 2014-09-19 09:20:16 UTC 
Closing this---we were not able to extract more information about reproducing this from Benedikt.