Bug 1126032

Summary: [abrt] mate-notification-daemon: g_return_if_fail_warning(): mate-notification-daemon killed by SIGTRAP
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik>
Component: mate-notification-daemonAssignee: Dan Mashal <dan.mashal>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: dan.mashal, fedora, rdieter, stefano
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/b99e49dff2126c71f169a15852a0004a1bb5f4f3
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:28b63d4cde4a0e5d731f4d9ed36f29054fa069e6
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-22 22:28:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:17:56 UTC 
Version-Release number of selected component:
mate-notification-daemon-1.6.1-2.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.2.3
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/libexec/mate-notification-daemon
crash_function: g_return_if_fail_warning
executable:     /usr/libexec/mate-notification-daemon
kernel:         3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            5242

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #2 g_return_if_fail_warning at gmessages.c:1034
 #3 gdk_screen_get_width at gdkscreen-x11.c:133
 #4 get_work_area at stack.c:74
 #5 notify_stack_shift_notifications at stack.c:267
 #6 notify_stack_remove_window at stack.c:373
 #11 gtk_object_dispose at gtkobject.c:421
 #13 _notify_timeout_destroy at daemon.c:149
 #14 g_hash_table_foreach_remove_or_steal at ghash.c:1412
 #15 g_hash_table_foreach_remove at ghash.c:1456
 #16 _check_expiration at daemon.c:741
Comment 1 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:17:59 UTC 
Created attachment 923347 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:00 UTC 
Created attachment 923348 [details]
File: cgroup
Comment 3 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:02 UTC 
Created attachment 923349 [details]
File: core_backtrace
Comment 4 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:03 UTC 
Created attachment 923350 [details]
File: dso_list
Comment 5 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:05 UTC 
Created attachment 923351 [details]
File: environ
Comment 6 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:06 UTC 
Created attachment 923352 [details]
File: limits
Comment 7 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:08 UTC 
Created attachment 923353 [details]
File: maps
Comment 8 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:09 UTC 
Created attachment 923354 [details]
File: open_fds
Comment 9 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:10 UTC 
Created attachment 923355 [details]
File: proc_pid_status
Comment 10 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-08-01 16:18:12 UTC 
Created attachment 923356 [details]
File: var_log_messages
Comment 11 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2014-10-04 15:06:47 UTC 
Can you describe a little more detailed what happend?
Did this issue occurs frequently ?
Comment 12 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2014-10-22 22:28:27 UTC 
reporter doesn't play with me!
Comment 13 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2014-10-24 22:54:24 UTC 
(In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #11)
> Can you describe a little more detailed what happend?
> Did this issue occurs frequently ?

Sorry, I missed this e-mail from bugzilla. This happened only once and I don't recall what I was doing when it happened. I'm ok with leaving this as closed, because it hasn't happened again.