Bug 112689
| Summary: | Cannot Compile Kernel linux-2.4.22-1.2135.nptl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Yousef Ourabi <yousefourabi> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-02-21 19:00:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
this bug has been around for a long time. see bug 105978 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105978 *** Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated. |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114 Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): linux-2.4.22-1.2135.nptl How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.cd /usr/src/linux-2.4 2.make mrproper && make menuconfig && make dep --> make bzImage 3.I tried repeating steps 1 and 2 after doing export CC=gcc32, however this had no effect. Actual Results: After attempting to compile the kernel I get the following error message kernel/kernel.o(.text+0x108c): In function `schedule': : undefined reference to `active_load_balance' make[1]: *** [kallsyms] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.22-1.2135.nptl' make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2 Expected Results: Expected Results??? ...Well a brand new shiney kernel would be nice... Additional info: I tried export CC=gcc32, I read in another bugzilla case that this "bug" of compiling the kernel with another version of GCC was intentional, if it was may I ask why?