Bug 1127461

Summary: Rubygem-Staypuft: HA-neutron deployment fails - the corosync.conf has a nodelist consisting of IP addresses from different subnets.
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Alexander Chuzhoy <sasha>
Component: rubygem-staypuftAssignee: Scott Seago <sseago>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Leonid Natapov <lnatapov>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 5.0 (RHEL 7)CC: aberezin, ajeain, lnatapov, mburns, yeylon
Target Milestone: ga   
Target Release: Installer   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ruby193-rubygem-staypuft-0.2.1.el6ost Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-21 18:08:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexander Chuzhoy 2014-08-06 22:30:46 UTC
Rubygem-Staypuft:  HA-neutron deployment fails - the corosync.conf has a nodelist consisting of IP addresses from different subnets.


Environment:
rhel-osp-installer-0.1.6-5.el6ost.noarch
openstack-foreman-installer-2.0.16-1.el6ost.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_openstack_simplify-0.0.6-8.el6ost.noarch
openstack-puppet-modules-2014.1-19.9.el6ost.noarch


Steps to reproduce:
1. Install rhel-osp-installer
2. Create/run an HA neutron deployment with 2 computes.

Result:
The deployment gets stuck on installing the controllers - 60%.
Running "pcs cluster status" on different nodes shows that there are 2 clusters:
A: consisting of 2 nodes
B: consisting of 1 node.
The corosync.conf has a nodelist consisting of IP addresses from 2 different subnets. Cluster "A" nodes IPs from one subnet, and cluster "B" uses the IP taken from another NIC- different subnet.


Expected:
Deployment should complete with no issues.

Comment 4 Alexander Chuzhoy 2014-08-11 20:41:53 UTC
Verified: rhel-osp-installer-0.1.9-1.el6ost.noarch


This particular issue doesn't reproduce now.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2014-08-21 18:08:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1090.html