Bug 1127569

Summary: Review Request: libstrophe - A simple, lightweight C library for writing XMPP clients
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christopher Meng <i>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: i, package-review, rdieter
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: Ready
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-05-08 18:42:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Christopher Meng 2014-08-07 07:28:40 UTC
Spec URL: http://sg.cicku.me/libstrophe.spec
SRPM URL: http://sg.cicku.me/libstrophe-0.8.5-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: libstrophe is a minimal XMPP library written in C. It has almost no external dependencies, only an XML parsing library (expat/libxml are both supported).
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2015-01-20 17:03:52 UTC
Site hosting .spec/src.rpm seems to be down. :(

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2015-02-05 11:13:03 UTC
Will upload new soon.

Comment 3 Raphael Groner 2015-04-05 15:01:20 UTC
Is there still any interest here?

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2015-04-05 17:49:28 UTC
It's been a couple of months already, marking as stalled review per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding

Feel free to re-open when/if you have anything new to add.

Comment 5 Christopher Meng 2015-04-06 00:16:19 UTC
Current version is not stable.

I intend to keep it open.

Comment 6 Rex Dieter 2015-05-08 18:42:17 UTC
so will you have updated/current links to add?  

If so, re-open when you do (but not before, there's little point keeping the review open for something that's not reviewable)