Bug 1127708
Summary: | Software Channel Entitlements: "Systems Subscribed" number contains guests registered on host with "Virtualization" add-on entitlement | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Jan Hutař <jhutar> |
Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Stephen Herr <sherr> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 560 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-08-12 13:18:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 924189 |
Description
Jan Hutař
2014-08-07 11:37:06 UTC
I agree this is strange, but it is expected. Guests that get "free" entitlements to channels through a virtualization add-on entitlement on the host do not consume either Flex or Regular Entitlements, yet they are indeed subscribed to the channels. The only thing that I think might be remotely incorrect is that the "27" link in the "Regular Consumed" ends up going to a page that includes the "virtualization-entitled" guests, where probably it should only include systems that are consuming a Regular (physical) entitlement. If this bug is going to remain open I would say it should be to ensure that /regular_in_channel_family.pxt only lists systems consuming regular entitlements, and there should be a separate page that lists all systems subscribed to the channel family. However considering that virtualization add-on entitlements are no longer sold (and that we have no customer complaints about this) my opinion would be that it's not worth the effort and we should probably close this bug. Thank you Stephen. Although there are other valid arguments in your comment, I do consider "virtualization add-on entitlements are no longer sold" more than satisfactory. |