Bug 1127876
Summary: | Platform process service CPU Percentage metric returns values that are inconsistent with actual CPU load measurements | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Operations Network | Reporter: | John Mazzitelli <mazz> |
Component: | Plugin -- Other | Assignee: | Michael Burman <miburman> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Mike Foley <mfoley> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | JON 3.2 | CC: | jshaughn, loleary, mfoley, myarboro, tsegismo |
Target Milestone: | ER01 | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | JON 3.3.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
When the process being monitored was no longer present, or the piql or pid file properties or values were changed, the native library the Platform Management plug-in used to retrieve CPU usage information returned unpredictable values. Improvements to the Platform Management plug-in better handle instances where a process is removed. ProcessComponent no longer adds data to the measurement report if the ProcessInfo instance shows that the process is down.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1091134 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2014-12-11 14:02:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1091134, 1109439, 1127875 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 1
Jay Shaughnessy
2014-08-08 21:28:26 UTC
Ignore Comment 1, that was intended for a different bug. Moving to MODIFIED as the fix is the same as for Bug 1109439 See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109439#c2 (In reply to Thomas Segismont from comment #3) > Moving to MODIFIED as the fix is the same as for Bug 1109439 > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109439#c2 Sorry, wrong references. Actually, the fix is the same as for Bug 1127875 See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127875#c1 In that case I think we can move to ON_QA, because the other BZ is ON_QA. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |