Bug 1128949

Summary:	OvfUpdateIntervalInMinutes/OvfItemsCountPerUpdate fields should be exposed to engine-config tool
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Marina Kalinin <mkalinin>
Component:	ovirt-engine-config	Assignee:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ori Gofen <ogofen>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.4.1-1	CC:	acanan, amureini, ecohen, gklein, iheim, laravot, lbopf, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, scohen, tnisan, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	3.5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	storage
Fixed In Version:	ovirt-3.5.0_rc1.1	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Two new configuration values for how OVFs are stored on storage domains were added and exposed to users in the engine-config tool: 'OvfUpdateIntervalInMinutes', which controls how often (in minutes) the update process is run; and 'OvfItemsCountPerUpdate', which controls how many virtual machines OVFs are saved per single VDSM call.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1134242 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-11 18:07:14 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1142923, 1156165

Description Marina Kalinin 2014-08-11 22:49:34 UTC

OvfUpdateIntervalInMinutes/OvfItemsCountPerUpdate fields should be exposed to engine-config tool.

I do not know why those fields are not exposed to engine-config, I think there is no harm having them exposed.

If there is a good reason not to have them exposed, I would be ok with closing this bug.

More about those fields:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1153963

Comment 3 Ori Gofen 2014-08-26 11:21:29 UTC

verified on rc1.1

Comment 4 Tal Nisan 2014-11-26 11:23:25 UTC

Please supply doc text

Comment 5 Marina Kalinin 2014-11-26 15:47:46 UTC

Docs team,
Please note, there is also a section in the Admin Guide(?) covering all the configurable parameters. Those should go there as well.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-02-11 18:07:14 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0158.html