Bug 1129815
Summary: | /var/cache/ovirt-engine/ovirt-host-deploy.tar is not being updated during a RHEV upgrade | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | James W. Mills <jamills> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.4.1-1 | CC: | acathrow, bazulay, dougsland, ecohen, iheim, jamills, jentrena, lpeer, oourfali, pdwyer, Rhev-m-bugs, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | infra | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-08-06 09:48:14 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Infra | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
James W. Mills
2014-08-13 17:46:04 UTC
The tarball is updated per the last timestamp of the files that are at /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy Have you saved the tarball, so its timestamp and content can be compared to files? If there was a problem in this mechanism I expect lots of bugs regarding this issue, but we have not gotten any. I'll have the customer send me the information you've requested, and we'll see if the timestamp is still intact. I'll also try and setup a test environment here, as this might have something to do the "double upgrade" from 3.1 to 3.3. Thanks! ~james any updates? No update yet. The customer has not responded, and I am unable to replicate this here. Thanks! ~james OK, please reopen when new information is available. Thanks! (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #5) > OK, please reopen when new information is available. Re-opening since this has been reported by another customer, I'm following up with the details. (In reply to Julio Entrena Perez from comment #6) > (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #5) > > OK, please reopen when new information is available. > > Re-opening since this has been reported by another customer, I'm following > up with the details. Please open a new bug, you do not re-open a year old bug that may or may not happen in different environment and probably different versions. |