Bug 112992

Summary:	RPM description refers to Red Hat Linux, not Fedora
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ben Stringer <ben>
Component:	specspo	Assignee:	Bernd Groh <bgroh>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	1	CC:	ebaak
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	specspo-10-1	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-04-21 17:24:24 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ben Stringer 2004-01-07 00:46:04 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1)
Gecko/20031114

Description of problem:
The description of the kernel RPM refers to the kernel being the core
of Red Hat Linux, rather than Fedora.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.4.22-1.2135.nptl

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -q kernel -i
2. read the description

Comment 1 Dave Jones 2004-01-14 05:51:20 UTC

Fixed in latest update kernel

Comment 2 Ben Stringer 2004-07-28 02:55:55 UTC

I'm still seeing the reference to Red Hat in the latest FC1 series of
kernels.

Eg. 
$ rpm -q --qf %{DESCRIPTION} kernel-2.4.22-1.2197.nptl
The kernel package contains the Linux kernel (vmlinuz), the core of
the Red Hat Linux operating system. The kernel handles the basic
functions of the operating system: memory allocation, process

Comment 3 Arjan van de Ven 2004-07-28 07:51:34 UTC

You probably have specspo installed which overrides the descriptions
from the actual package.

Comment 4 Ben Stringer 2004-07-28 13:33:54 UTC

Thanks - I was not aware of specspo, but I do have it installed, as it
shipped with FC1, and I installed all packages.  I'll change this
bug's component to specspo.

Comment 5 John Thacker 2006-04-21 17:24:24 UTC

This is fixed in more recent specspo packages.