Bug 1130437

Summary: wrong alphabetical order of keyboard layouts
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Marcel Kolaja <mkolaja>
Component: anacondaAssignee: David Shea <dshea>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: jikortus, kvolny
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: anaconda-21.48.22.1-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 09:47:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot of the problem none

Description Marcel Kolaja 2014-08-15 08:43:20 UTC
Description of problem:
Keyboard layouts are sorted in a wrong order. Layouts starting with an accent are at the end of the list. However, when Czech language is chosen for the installation, layouts starting with Č for instance, like Čeština, should be place right after C, not after Z.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL-7.0-20140507.0-Server-x86_64-boot.iso

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. start the installation
2. select Czech language for the installation
3. look for available keyboard layouts

Actual results:
keyboard layouts are incorrectly sorted

Expected results:
keyboard layouts are correctly sorted

Additional info:
N/A

Comment 2 David Shea 2014-10-30 18:54:39 UTC
Fixed in upstream commit b3dd7e37

Comment 3 Karel Volný 2015-01-07 14:42:19 UTC
Created attachment 977332 [details]
screenshot of the problem

(In reply to David Shea from comment #2)
> Fixed in upstream commit b3dd7e37

I'm a bit confused, the comment is from 2014-10-30 but it didn't get included into 7.1?

- I've just hit the problem with RHEL-7.1-20150107.n.0-Workstation-x86_64-boot.iso

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 09:47:29 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2284.html