Bug 1131423
Summary: | Review Request: menhir - LR(1) parser generator for OCaml | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | François Cami <contribs> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | contribs, loganjerry, package-review, scottt.tw |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-08-19 15:58:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Richard W.M. Jones
2014-08-19 08:58:59 UTC
Menhir is required for js-of-ocaml >= 2. Adding js-of-ocaml maintainer. rpmlint output: menhir.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocamlyacc -> bellyache menhir.src:77: W: macro-in-comment %doc menhir.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocamlyacc -> bellyache menhir.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/menhir/demos/ocamldep.wrapper /usr/bin/env menhir.x86_64: W: ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib64/ocaml/menhirLib/META menhir-devel.x86_64: W: ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib64/ocaml/menhirLib/menhirLib.cmx 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Note "ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied" happens because rpmlint thinks the package should be called "ocaml-*". However in this case the package is just called menhir upstream and since it is a standalone program ("/usr/bin/menhir") that seems a reasonable name for the Fedora package too. Successful scratch build in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7426201 Taken, review coming soon. How is this different from the existing ocaml-menhir package? (In reply to Jerry James from comment #5) > How is this different from the existing ocaml-menhir package? Am I gonna look stupid here? Yes I am. This package already exists in Fedora. Sorry about that. |