Bug 1132478

Summary:	[RFE][GUI over REST API gaps] missing move multiple disks (in a single request)
Product:	[oVirt] ovirt-engine	Reporter:	Einav Cohen <ecohen>
Component:	RestAPI	Assignee:	Nobody <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.5.0	CC:	acanan, amureini, bazulay, bugs, derez, gklein, lsurette, oramraz, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, scohen, srevivo, tnisan, ykaul, ylavi
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release:	---	Flags:	ylavi: ovirt-future? rule-engine: planning_ack? rule-engine: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-06 12:23:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1132506

Description Einav Cohen 2014-08-21 12:18:58 UTC

we are missing the ability to move multiple disks at once from the rest-api. 

I assume that this can be worked around by making multiple requests for moving a single disk, however in this case, we might miss a special logic that is applied due to the "awareness" of the command that multiple disks are being moved (similar to RunMultipleAction - see bug 1132246)

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2015-11-26 16:03:56 UTC

I'm keeping this open as I believe regardless of GUI over REST API it has value. Allon?

Comment 2 Allon Mureinik 2015-11-29 11:37:39 UTC

(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #1)
> I'm keeping this open as I believe regardless of GUI over REST API it has
> value. Allon?
Wroth keeping open, not committing for 4.0, unless there's a solid usecase for it.

Comment 4 Yaniv Lavi 2016-12-05 13:51:14 UTC

I suggest closing this. Any objections?

Comment 5 Allon Mureinik 2016-12-06 12:23:35 UTC

(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #4)
> I suggest closing this. Any objections?
Agreed.