Bug 1134328
| Summary: | specifying basedir makes mariadb-galera fail to start | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lukas Bezdicka <lbezdick> | ||||
| Component: | mariadb-galera | Assignee: | Ryan O'Hara <rohara> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | apevec, hhorak, lars, rmeggins, rohara | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-09-19 10:08:53 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1115619, 1129760, 1139384, 1139386 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
This looks like the same problem we fixed in RHOS. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109306 Could you please apply fixes on F21 F20 and EL7 packages? Packages build. Submitting update for f20/f21 now. The epel7 branch was retired due to conflicts. mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21 mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc20 (In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #3) > The epel7 branch was retired due to conflicts. I've rebuilt Fedora SRPMs in RDO Coprs: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jruzicka/rdo-icehouse-epel-7/build/30725/ https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jruzicka/rdo-juno-epel-7/build/30726/ (In reply to Alan Pevec from comment #6) > (In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #3) > > The epel7 branch was retired due to conflicts. > > I've rebuilt Fedora SRPMs in RDO Coprs: > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jruzicka/rdo-icehouse-epel-7/build/ > 30725/ > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jruzicka/rdo-juno-epel-7/build/30726/ Thanks, Alan. I suggest we continue to use SRPMs from the rhos branches until we've moved off of RHEL6. Since we don't have a branches for el6/el7 in Fedora, it is a bit of a pain to manage these. When we only need to build for rhel7, we should be able to use Fedora SRPMs in copr. I suspect when we get to F22, though, we'll move to mariadb 10.x and that could be complicated. > I suggest we continue to use SRPMs from the rhos branches > until we've moved off of RHEL6. ok, here's rebuild for RDO Icehouse el6 https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jruzicka/rdo-icehouse-epel-6/build/30778/ But for RDO Icehouse el7 we could keep rebuilding 5.5 from F21 ? > When we only need to build for rhel7, we should be able to use Fedora SRPMs > in copr. I suspect when we get to F22, though, we'll move to mariadb 10.x > and that could be complicated. What are the issues with 10.x ? RDO Juno is el7 only and I suggest we move to 10.x there to shake out issues early. (In reply to Alan Pevec from comment #8) > > I suggest we continue to use SRPMs from the rhos branches > > until we've moved off of RHEL6. > > ok, here's rebuild for RDO Icehouse el6 > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jruzicka/rdo-icehouse-epel-6/build/ > 30778/ > > But for RDO Icehouse el7 we could keep rebuilding 5.5 from F21 ? Yes. > > When we only need to build for rhel7, we should be able to use Fedora SRPMs > > in copr. I suspect when we get to F22, though, we'll move to mariadb 10.x > > and that could be complicated. > > What are the issues with 10.x ? I don't know. From my very basic testing, it works. > RDO Juno is el7 only and I suggest we move to 10.x there to shake out issues > early. MariaDB 10.x won't be in Fedora until F22, at least that is my understanding. Package mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10250/mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). *** Bug 1139338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1139382 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1139386 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1139384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. mariadb-galera-5.5.39-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Created attachment 931372 [details] add mariadb-galera searchdir to mysql_install_db Description of problem: config option basedir=/usr causes mariadb to fail to start. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): all mariadb-galera packages How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. add [mysqld] basedir=/usr option to server.cnf 2. restart mariadb 3. fail Actual results: mariadb tries to search /usr/share/mysql for startup sqls, this fails. Expected results: It should search in /usr/share/mariadb-galera. Additional info: see attached patch