Bug 113825
Summary: | RFE: /etc/pam.d/su should use pam_timestamp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | Mike MacCana <mmaccana> |
Component: | coreutils | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0 | CC: | nalin |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-12-10 16:34:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mike MacCana
2004-01-19 00:35:18 UTC
Not sure about this. Nalin, what do you think? I'd say WONTFIX, most emphatically. Rationale: when we first looked at introducing pam_timestamp, it's non-obviousness in most situations was a problem, because it surpised just about everybody. To alleviate this, the panel icon was added. This won't do for 'su' (or other text-mode configuration tools) because you can't be certain that it's being run in a graphical environment where the panel icon can signal the user that this is going on. For this reason, text-mode interfaces don't use pam_timestamp, and in my mind the same reasoning applies 'su'. Makes sense to me. A simple solution would be to change the prompt to indicate the timestamp is active. This would save a huge amount of time and address the current inconsistency between graphical and command line tools. Putting indicators in the prompt isn't generally liked (see fedora-devel discussion for example). |