Bug 1140010

Summary: DHT :- move this log from -"dht_lookup_everywhere_done <VOLUME> STATUS: hashed_subvol <sub-vol> cached _subvol null" from INFO to DEBUG
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Rachana Patel <racpatel>
Component: distributeAssignee: vsomyaju
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: amainkar
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rhgs-3.0CC: kdhananj, nbalacha, nsathyan, ssamanta, vagarwal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: RHGS 3.0.1   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.6.0.29-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-29 07:46:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1139774    

Description Rachana Patel 2014-09-10 07:20:05 UTC
Description of problem:
=======================
below logging message should come in DEBUG not in INFO


[2014-09-09 19:55:25.081089] I [dht-common.c:1828:dht_lookup_cbk] 2-screw-dht: Entry /new/f60-8 missing on subvol screw-client-6
[2014-09-09 19:55:25.083641] I [dht-common.c:1085:dht_lookup_everywhere_done] 2-screw-dht: STATUS: hashed_subvol screw-client-6 cached_subvol null



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
=============================================================
3.6.0.28-1.el6rhs.x86_64



How reproducible:
=================
always

Comment 6 Rachana Patel 2014-09-22 14:08:11 UTC
verified with 3.6.0.29-1.el6rhs.x86_64, 
working as expected hence moving to verified

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2014-09-29 07:46:42 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1315.html