Bug 1140159

Summary: xulrunner: fails to build on s390(x) and ppc64le
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jakub Čajka <jcajka>
Component: xulrunnerAssignee: Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: caillon+fedoraproject, dan, gecko-bugs-nobody, jcajka, john.j5live, stransky
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-11-19 11:46:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 467765, 1051573    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed solution
none
patch split none

Description Jakub Čajka 2014-09-10 11:44:22 UTC 
Created attachment 936115 [details]
Proposed solution

Xulrunner-32.0-1 build fails with lot of undefined/missing stuff in Value.h. It seems that up mentioned architectures were omitted in configure.in, as adding/modifying definitions fixes the build(Same as FF). In attachment is patch doing these changes. Please review it.

Failing build:
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=268831

Successful scratch builds with patch:

http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1537946
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2097254
Comment 1 Jakub Čajka 2014-09-10 13:19:24 UTC 
Created attachment 936138 [details]
patch split
Comment 2 Martin Stransky 2014-11-19 11:14:52 UTC 
Is that still a problem on F19?
Comment 3 Dan Horák 2014-11-19 11:30:04 UTC 
nope, we have xulrunner-33.0-2.fc19 built
Comment 4 Martin Stransky 2014-11-19 11:46:32 UTC 
okay, thanks.