Bug 1140447
Summary: | [virtio-win][viorng]should use uniformed name for WDFCoinstallerXXX.dll | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | lijin <lijin> | |
Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Mike Bonnet <mikeb> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | low | |||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | ailan, hhuang, jkurik, knoel, mdeng, michen, mikeb, ovasik, rbalakri, virt-maint, vrozenfe | |
Target Milestone: | rc | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: |
NO_DOCS
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1207417 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-24 08:44:00 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1207417 |
Description
lijin
2014-09-11 02:23:24 UTC
the corresponding version of viorng in virtio-win-1.7.2-1.el6 is build88,and as comment#0 said,build88 does not hit this issue. (In reply to lijin from comment #7) > the corresponding version of viorng in virtio-win-1.7.2-1.el6 is build88,and > as comment#0 said,build88 does not hit this issue. Right, the driver binaries are the same, but in virtio-win-1.7.2-1.el6 for some reason WdfCoInstaller01011.dll was renamed to WdfCoinstaller01011.dll cc'ing Mike Bonnet from Release Engineering team to comment on this issue. still hit this issue with virtio-win-1.7.3-1.el7.noarch,the viorng version is build96 check with virtio-win-1.7.4-1,steps same as comment#0 actual result: all the wdf files are named as WdfCo*I*nstaller01011.dll instead of WdfCo*i*nstaller01011.dll. So this issue has been fixed already. change status to verified according to comment#18 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2513.html |