Bug 1145042
Summary: | The output of "/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M ?" should be ordered. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | huiqingding <huding> |
Component: | qemu-kvm-rhev | Assignee: | Laszlo Ersek <lersek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | hhuang, huding, juzhang, lersek, marcel, virt-maint, xfu |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.2-7.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 09:55:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
huiqingding
2014-09-22 09:12:17 UTC
Not sure if we should care about the ordering. If we should, then it was most likely broken in commit 261747f176f6f2d88f8268aaebfdd1a1afe887e2 Author: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a> Date: Wed Mar 5 19:30:46 2014 +0200 vl: Use MachineClass instead of global QEMUMachine list The machine registration flow is refactored to use the QOM functionality. Instead of linking the machines into a list, each machine has a type and the types can be traversed in the QOM way. Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber> Before this commit, a new machine type was always appended to the end of a list at registration. After the commit, the machine type is registered with type_register(), which calls g_hash_table_insert() internally. Hash tables don't keep or provide ordering. The list of supported machine types is printed by machine_parse(), which was rebased from traversing the permanent list to traversing an ad-hoc list retrieved with object_class_get_list(TYPE_MACHINE, false). This function uses g_hash_table_foreach() internally, which doesn't provide ordering. If the order is significant, then machine_parse() should sort the list before printing it. Posted upstream series http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-09/msg04167.html Posted upstream v2 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/298434 Upstream commits to backport: 1 2709f26 well-defined listing order for machine types 2 562542b i386/pc: add piix and q35 machtypes to sorting families for -M \? Fix included in qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.2-7.el7 Reproduce this issue using the following version: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.2-5.el7.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. # /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M ? Supported machines are: rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC rhel6.5.0 RHEL 6.5.0 PC rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC pc-i440fx-rhel7.0.0 RHEL 7.0.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) q35 RHEL-7.1.0 PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (alias of pc-q35-rhel7.1.0) pc-q35-rhel7.1.0 RHEL-7.1.0 PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC none empty machine pc RHEL 7.1.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (alias of pc-i440fx-rhel7.1.0) pc-i440fx-rhel7.1.0 RHEL 7.1.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (default) pc-q35-rhel7.0.0 RHEL-7.0.0 PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) rhel6.4.0 RHEL 6.4.0 PC Verify this issue using the following version: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.2-7.el7.x86_64 Steps to Verify: 1. # /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M ? Supported machines are: pc RHEL 7.1.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (alias of pc-i440fx-rhel7.1.0) pc-i440fx-rhel7.1.0 RHEL 7.1.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (default) pc-i440fx-rhel7.0.0 RHEL 7.0.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) rhel6.5.0 RHEL 6.5.0 PC rhel6.4.0 RHEL 6.4.0 PC rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC q35 RHEL-7.1.0 PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (alias of pc-q35-rhel7.1.0) pc-q35-rhel7.1.0 RHEL-7.1.0 PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) pc-q35-rhel7.0.0 RHEL-7.0.0 PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) none empty machine The above output is ordered, so this bug has been fixed. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0624.html |