Bug 11452
Summary: | Installer has problem with dual-boot (w/FAT32 Windows) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | fischer |
Component: | installer | Assignee: | Dale Lovelace <dale> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-11-01 21:19:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
fischer
2000-05-16 19:22:57 UTC
What is the original state of the partition table? The original partition table had just one 8Gb partition (I set it with fdisk, then installed Windows 98 into it). With the Red-Hat installation I added one physical partition (/boot; about 32Mb if I remember correctly), and two logical ones (a 512Mb swap and the rest of the hardisk went to root); all this done through the Red-Hat installation program (custom installation mode). Lilo was also installed updating the mbr by the installation program. Could you please give the original partition table state as the linux command 'fdisk -l' would output it? What is the geometry of your drive? The information I got from fdisk: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2482 cylinders. The original partition table had one line. I think it was /dev/hda1 (bootable), start:1, end:1020, blocks:8193118+, id:b, system:Win95 Fat32 (actually this is the first line of the table now). The installer added one physical partition (/boot from 1021 to 1023) and two logical ones (root and swap). Important note: I have just heard that the problem has to do with the installation of LILO on the mbr (Windows seems to have stringent demands from the mbr); it probably wouldn't occur if LILO is installed elsewhere. Brock can you reproduce this problem with Pinstripe? reassigning these to dale for further review ... I don't have this exact disk, but with a similar 20 gig disk I could not reproduce this. If you have any more information on this please feel free to reopen this bug. |