Bug 1146670

Feel free. I don't have the time or inclination for a beta.

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

apache-poi 3.11-beta3 is available

apache-poi 3.11 is available

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Created attachment 998766 [details]
apache poi spec file

i dont know if some xsd files are free or not, i dont understand the license of these:

http://dublincore.org/about/software/license1/
http://dublincore.org/about/software/license2/
http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dc.xsd
http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dcterms.xsd
http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dcmitype.xsd

W3C (?)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd

http://www.etsi.org/index.php/terms-of-use
http://uri.etsi.org/01903/v1.3.2/XAdES.xsd
http://uri.etsi.org/01903/v1.4.1/XAdESv141.xsd

(?)
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Office%20Open%20XML%201st%20edition%20Part%202%20(PDF).zip

The Dublincore XML and RDF schemas are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

The W3 schema is under the W3C license.

I have no idea what license the ETSI schema is under, you should ask upstream if they know or can find out.

The ECMA license is also unclear, I was only able to find this:
http://ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm

And that isn't really a license.

You should ask upstream. :/

(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #8)
> The ECMA license is also unclear, I was only able to find this:
> http://ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm
> 
> And that isn't really a license.
> 
> You should ask upstream. :/
I received this response from ECMA, but again for me is unclear ...
(from attached email)
"What is concretely your question regarding the Ecma Copyrights?
Generally, we are rather liberal about it. You can use it, but please make reference to Ecma.
What is not allowed is forking. E.g. you take the ECMA-262 (ECMAScript), you develop it further in a non-compatible way, and you still call it as ECMAScript."

Created attachment 1003983 [details]
ECMA email

Created attachment 1019387 [details]
apache poi spec file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57862

Created attachment 1022168 [details]
ecma license mail

Creative Commons license 4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike) ( ... maybe ..see ecma license mail attached)
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Office%20Open%20XML%201st%20edition%20Part%202%20(PDF).zip
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Office%20Open%20XML%201st%20edition%20Part%204%20(PDF).zip

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dc.xsd
http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dcterms.xsd
http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dcmitype.xsd

W3C license
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd

Currently unknown
http://uri.etsi.org/01903/v1.3.2/XAdES.xsd
http://uri.etsi.org/01903/v1.4.1/XAdESv141.xsd

see https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57862

apache-poi 3.12 is available

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

After discussion with RH Legal, the nature of the XSD files (they are XML files) means that they meet the "phone book" test and can be considered to be non-copyrightable works. Thus, for the files where the license is unknown, unclear, or otherwise troublesome, we treat them as being uncopyrighted works.

I'm lifting FE-Legal here as a result.

Latest upstream release: 3.13-20150929
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.12-2.fc24
URL: http://www.apache.org/dist/poi/release/
Please, consider upgrading

Created attachment 1077393 [details]
Update to 3.13

- add BuildRequired: rhino
  used in the ant scriptdef task

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11236164

Note: this release "could" break backward compatibility
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1748

Hi Gil,

Would you like to apply for co-maintainership of this package?

(In reply to Mat Booth from comment #23)
> Hi Gil,
> 
> Would you like to apply for co-maintainership of this package?

Sure, thanks
Regards

(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #24)
> (In reply to Mat Booth from comment #23)
> > Hi Gil,
> > 
> > Would you like to apply for co-maintainership of this package?
> 
> Sure, thanks
> Regards

Granted, thanks for working on it :-)

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12014469