Bug 1147706
Summary: | RFE: Boolean to allow zabbix to run sudo | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.5 | CC: | charles_sheridan, dwalsh, mmalik, ssekidde |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-11-30 03:27:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Orion Poplawski
2014-09-29 22:48:09 UTC
# rpm -qa selinux-policy\* selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch selinux-policy-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch # sesearch -s zabbix_agent_t -t sudo_exec_t -c file -A -C Found 4 semantic av rules: allow zabbix_agent_t file_type : file getattr ; allow zabbix_agent_t exec_type : file { ioctl read getattr lock open } ; allow files_unconfined_type file_type : file { ioctl read write create getattr setattr lock relabelfrom relabelto append unlink link rename execute swapon quotaon mounton execute_no_trans entrypoint open } ; ET allow files_unconfined_type file_type : file execmod ; [ allow_execmod ] # The selinux-policy packages present in RHEL-6.6 fix the problem. Please see BZ#1081038. Can't see BZ#1081038 - not authorized. But thanks for the update. (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3) > Can't see BZ#1081038 - not authorized. But thanks for the update. Orion, Can you verify with the latest RHEL6-6 policy https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1568.html Yes, appears to be working fine with -260. Thanks. |