Bug 114925
Summary: | CAN-2003-0618 leaks file existance information | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Mark J. Cox <mjc> |
Component: | perl | Assignee: | Chip Turner <cturner> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | leonard-rh-bugzilla |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-05-28 12:20:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mark J. Cox
2004-02-04 16:35:16 UTC
Does this issue affect FC 1 as well? The answer to my own question is yes. This still affects perl-suidperl-5.8.3-16. Will we see a RHL 9 erratum before its EOL? Discussion over the proposed patch reached the conclusion that the patch wasn't the right one to solve this issue without side-effects. In fact Debian recently reissued their packages with an altered fix. Given the low risk of this issue I feel it unlikely that we will errata this for RHL9. |