Bug 1149569
Summary: | doesn't include /usr/lib/os-release | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rahul Sundaram <metherid> |
Component: | systemd | Assignee: | systemd-maint |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 21 | CC: | johannbg, jsynacek, lnykryn, msekleta, s, systemd-maint, vpavlin, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-01-31 16:57:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1149568 |
Description
Rahul Sundaram
2014-10-06 05:59:58 UTC
I think that the /etc/os-release link should be packaged in fedora-release*, because the /usr/lib/os-release file is there. I am not sure how to parse that. fedora-release does NOT have /usr/lib/os-release rpm -ql fedora-release /etc/fedora-release /etc/issue /etc/issue.net /etc/os-release /etc/redhat-release /etc/system-release /etc/system-release-cpe /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.dist /usr/share/licenses/fedora-release /usr/share/licenses/fedora-release/Fedora-Legal-README.txt /usr/share/licenses/fedora-release/LICENSE Dennis (see the linked bug report) is of the opinion that /etc/os-release not being a symlink isn't a problem. Oh, never mind. I see that you have already commented on the linked bug report. I still think this should go into fedora-release. Let's pursue it there. |