Bug 1149906
| Summary: | Mixed up mod_proxy_balancer jvmRoutes causing sticky session breaks | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Aaron Ogburn <aogburn> |
| Component: | httpd | Assignee: | Luboš Uhliarik <luhliari> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Filip Holec <fholec> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 6.7 | CC: | csutherl, dkutalek, dmasirka, jkaluza, jorton, psplicha, williama_lovaton |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | httpd-2.2.15-40.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
The order of mod_proxy workers was not checked when httpd configuration was reloaded. Consequently, when mod_proxy workers had been removed, added, or their order changed, their parameters and scores could become mixed. The order of mod_proxy workers has been made internally consistent during configuration reload.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-07-22 05:53:33 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1075802, 1159820 | ||
|
Description
Aaron Ogburn
2014-10-06 21:20:55 UTC
Hello, It seems a patch is being proposed in the upstream bug. I just created a support ticket here: https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/01243147/ If you get test RPMS I'm willing to test them in production. Thanks a lot for your help. William - thanks for filing a ticket. Yes, we'd appreciate some testing on this patch, we'll get some test packages prepared next week. William, against which RHEL6 version do they need the test RPM? Can you clarify it's RHEL-6.4? (In reply to Jan Kaluža from comment #7) > William, against which RHEL6 version do they need the test RPM? Can you > clarify it's RHEL-6.4? Yeah, right now I'm on RHEL 6.4 but I can upgrade my system to RHEL 6.5 if needed. (In reply to Jan Kaluža from comment #7) > William, against which RHEL6 version do they need the test RPM? Can you > clarify it's RHEL-6.4? Hello Jan, Just to be a little bit clearer, the base system is RHEL 6.4 but trying to solve this problem I decided to upgrade httpd and mod_ssl to the latest update available in RHN which was post RHEL 6.5 at the time. This didn't solve the problem. In a little bit of despair I tried upgrading httpd and mod_ssl to the latest 2.2.27 from a Centos repo but again this didn't solve the problem. Obviously, for me would be a lot better to "downgrade" apache to the oficial RHEL package and as I said I'm willing to do so testing the RPMs with the patches you are working on. Also I'm willing to upgrade the whole system to RHEL 6.5 if you want. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1249.html |