Bug 1149970
| Summary: | [Docs] [Install] The list of firewall rules that engine-setup takes care of must be updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Andrew Dahms <adahms> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Tahlia Richardson <trichard> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Julie <juwu> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.5.0 | CC: | ecohen, gklein, juwu, lsurette, lvernia, michal.skrivanek, mperina, oourfali, rbalakri, trichard, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3.5.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-03-02 02:04:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Andrew Dahms
2014-10-07 04:43:57 UTC
Checked in Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization-Installation_Guide-3.5-en-US-3.5-33. Entries for ports 6100 and 7410 have been added as requested. Moving to VERIFIED. sorry for a late response, but I think the port 6100 would deserve a little clarification port 6100 is needed for the websocket proxy access. It is specifically used _only_ when customer uses web-based console clients (noVNC, spice-html5) and is running the websocket proxy (which is a mandatory component in this case) on the engine host. 3.5 will/does support deployment of the proxy to a different host. And regular/standalone console clients do not need that I understand the description is a bit convoluted so please try to think of some sensible rephrase:-) again, my apologies about late response Thanks for that info, Michal. How about: "[This port is] needed for websocket proxy access when using web-based console clients (noVNC and spice-html5) on the engine." ? thanks. Just somehow make clear the websocket proxy may or may not be running on the engine host. There's probably a new section about deploying the proxy elsewhere since it's a new feature. But on monday morning I don't have any better wording to offer....:-) (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #11) > thanks. Just somehow make clear the websocket proxy may or may not be > running on the engine host. There's probably a new section about deploying > the proxy elsewhere since it's a new feature. > > But on monday morning I don't have any better wording to offer....:-) Completely understandable ;) Okay, how about: "[This port] provides websocket proxy access for web-based console clients (noVNC and spice-html5) when the websocket proxy is running on the Manager. If the websocket proxy is running on a different host, however, this port is not used." ? sounds good! Excellent, thanks Michal! Moving this to ON_QA. Documentation Link ------------------------------ https://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.5/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#sect-Firewalls What Changed ------------------------------ Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Firewall Requirements [7850-727851] Added ports 6100 and 7410 Updated revision history [34615-727854] NVR ------------------------------ Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization-Installation_Guide-3.5-web-en-US-3.5-37.el6eng Content already published. |