Bug 1151072

I'll take this for a review.

Rmplint complies about 'no binary' but the Arch exclusivity is inherited from docker.

This looks good.

Thanks!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: fig
Short Description: Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
Upstream URL: http://www.fig.sh
Owners: mstuchli
Branches: f21
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

fig-0.5.2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fig-0.5.2-1.fc21

fig-0.5.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.

Hi,

Why not also push it to f20 ? Fig 1.0 was released along with Docker 1.3, and docker-io has been updated to 1.3 in f20. I haven't looked at f19 but I suppose it should be included too if docker-io is available and up-to-date.

I'll give a try to fig 1.0 available in f21 testing and send some feedback, probably tomorrow!

Dridi

fig-0.5.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.

(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #7)
> Hi,
> 
> Why not also push it to f20 ? Fig 1.0 was released along with Docker 1.3,
> and docker-io has been updated to 1.3 in f20. I haven't looked at f19 but I
> suppose it should be included too if docker-io is available and up-to-date.
> 
> I'll give a try to fig 1.0 available in f21 testing and send some feedback,
> probably tomorrow!
> 
> Dridi

Hey Dridi,
f20 doesn't seem to have python-texttable [0], one of the dependencies of fig.

Are you particularly interested in having fig in f20?

Matt

[0] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-texttable

(In reply to Matej Stuchlik from comment #9)
> Hey Dridi,
> f20 doesn't seem to have python-texttable [0], one of the dependencies of
> fig.

Is this the only missing piece? I can open a bug, hoping that python-texttable isn't itself missing something else in f20.

> Are you particularly interested in having fig in f20?

Yes! Because I know for a fact that 50% of my laptops won't upgrade immediately to f21 (and by that I mean my $dayjob laptop:) and I need fig on both for different self-contained reasons.

> Matt
> 
> [0] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-texttable

(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #10)
> (In reply to Matej Stuchlik from comment #9)
> > Hey Dridi,
> > f20 doesn't seem to have python-texttable [0], one of the dependencies of
> > fig.
> 
> Is this the only missing piece? I can open a bug, hoping that
> python-texttable isn't itself missing something else in f20.

As far as I'm aware, yes. Please do, I'm fairly busy this week.

> > Are you particularly interested in having fig in f20?
> 
> Yes! Because I know for a fact that 50% of my laptops won't upgrade
> immediately to f21 (and by that I mean my $dayjob laptop:) and I need fig on
> both for different self-contained reasons.

Okay, if we manage to resolve the dependency issue I'll add a f20 branch. :)

> > Matt
> > 
> > [0] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-texttable

It turned out to be an infra-related issue, an update has been pushed for f20!

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-texttable-0.8.1-4.fc20

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: fig
New Branches: f20
Owners: mstuchli
InitialCC: 

All requires are now satisfied even in f20.

I already ported my work to fig when I tested your update for f21, I'll be able to give you feedback quickly through bodhi!

Thanks again!

Git done (by process-git-requests).

fig-1.0.0-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fig-1.0.0-4.fc20

fig-1.0.0-5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fig-1.0.0-5.fc20

fig-1.0.0-5.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.