Bug 1152022

Summary:	Use license macro in RPMs for packages in Cloud Image
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik>
Component:	Changes Tracking	Assignee:	Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	21	CC:	mattdm
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	ChangeAcceptedF21 SystemWideChange
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-12-08 15:22:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jaroslav Reznik 2014-10-13 11:07:27 UTC

This is a tracking bug for Change: Use license macro in RPMs for packages in Cloud Image 
For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use_license_macro_in_RPMs_for_packages_in_Cloud_Image

Use new %license macro to separate license files from documentation, so the latter can be excluded from container images without stripping license information which must be included. 

Note: sorry for late bug creation, it wasn't picked by script.

Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2014-10-14 11:33:41 UTC

This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline (Former Accepted Changes 100% Complete) is on 2014-10-14 [1].

All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA.

As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan. All incompleted Changes will be reported to FESCo on 2014-10-15 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule

Comment 2 Matthew Miller 2014-10-14 12:58:49 UTC

I believe that this is complete, but I haven't actually confirmed that it is correct for the package set in the beta.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Reznik 2014-10-15 11:21:55 UTC

Thanks, setting to ON_QA to confirm it's correct in Beta.