Bug 1157241
| Summary: | [NetKVM] Uninitialized reserved field in procNumber structure | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Yossi Hindin <yhindin> |
| Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Yvugenfi <yvugenfi> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.2 | CC: | juzhang, knoel, lijin, mdeng, michen, rbalakri, virt-maint, vrozenfe, yhindin, yvugenfi |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Windows | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
NO_DOCS
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-11-24 08:45:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Yossi Hindin
2014-10-26 14:09:46 UTC
The bug was fixed by commit c6425b88b52e mdeng,please verify this bug with latest build Hi Yan, QE found the issue has been fixed already by you.Can you give a way for help QE to verify the bug ? Thanks in advance ! Best Regards, Min (In reply to dengmin from comment #8) > Hi Yan, > > QE found the issue has been fixed already by you.Can you give a way for > help QE to verify the bug ? Thanks in advance ! > > Best Regards, > Min Passing WHQL RSS test is a good indication that this is fixed. Best regards, Yan. (In reply to Yan Vugenfirer from comment #9) > (In reply to dengmin from comment #8) > > Hi Yan, > > > > QE found the issue has been fixed already by you.Can you give a way for > > help QE to verify the bug ? Thanks in advance ! > > > > Best Regards, > > Min > > Passing WHQL RSS test is a good indication that this is fixed. > > Best regards, > Yan. on going and still needinfo myself change status to verified according to comment#11 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2513.html |