Bug 1157413

Summary: Japanese man page for date(1) missing description of "%n, %N"
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: masanari iida <masanari_iida>
Component: man-pages-jaAssignee: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: QE Internationalization Bugs <qe-i18n-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3CC: bbarve, lijli
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-10 10:04:12 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
no description about %n/%N
none
man page for date(1) corrected. none

Description masanari iida 2014-10-27 08:30:18 UTC
Description of problem:
Japanese man page for date(1) missing description of "%n, %N"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
man-pages-ja-20100115-6.el6.noarch


How reproducible:
Always

Current output
(Missing %n and %N between %M and %p)

       %M     分 (00..59)

       %p     AM あるいは PM のロケール


Expected results:

       %M     minute (00..59)

       %n     a newline

       %N     nanoseconds (000000000..999999999)

       %p     locale's equivalent of either AM or PM; blank if not known

Comment 4 Bhushan Barve 2015-01-22 11:51:34 UTC
Created attachment 982750 [details]
no description about %n/%N

Comment 5 Akira TAGOH 2015-01-22 12:17:28 UTC
Fixed in -10.

Comment 7 Bhushan Barve 2015-01-23 11:29:49 UTC
Created attachment 983305 [details]
man page for date(1) corrected.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-10 10:04:12 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0665.html