Bug 1157710

Summary:	Allow the configuration of Signature and Encryption on IDP and SP even if Key Store is not set up.
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6	Reporter:	Jakub Cechacek <jcechace>
Component:	Web Console	Assignee:	Pedro Igor <psilva>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Pavel Jelinek <pjelinek>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.4.0	CC:	brian.stansberry, hbraun, hpehl, jkudrnac, kkhan, pjelinek, psilva
Target Milestone:	DR8
Target Release:	EAP 6.4.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-08-19 12:46:25 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jakub Cechacek 2014-10-27 14:32:46 UTC

Currently it is not possible to configure Signature and Encryption related attributes on IDP and SP resources unless parent Federation has its Key Store set up.

This configuration can be found under

For IDP:
Configuration -> Picketlink -> Federation -> view configuration -> Identity Provider -> Signature Policy / Encryption Policy 
For SP:
Configuration -> Picketlink -> Federation -> view configuration -> Service Provider -> Signature and Encryption Policy

However this configuration is possible via CLI and thus we propose to make Admin Console behave constantly. Allow the configuration but keep the information message displayed in case when Key Store is not configured.

Comment 1 Pedro Igor 2014-10-27 22:12:32 UTC

https://github.com/picketlink/picketlink-console/pull/22

Comment 2 Jakub Cechacek 2014-11-09 22:12:43 UTC

It is now possible to modify the configuration. However no value is displayed in read view.

Comment 3 Pedro Igor 2014-11-10 11:39:04 UTC

https://github.com/picketlink/picketlink-console/pull/25

Comment 4 Pavel Jelinek 2014-11-26 09:30:35 UTC

Should this still remain in POST state?

Comment 5 Jakub Cechacek 2014-12-08 13:17:01 UTC

Verified 6.4.0.DR12

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 02:49:46 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days