Bug 1158759
| Summary: | Wrong permission for configuration file /etc/sysconfig/virt-who on rhel7.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Liushihui <shihliu> |
| Component: | virt-who | Assignee: | Radek Novacek <rnovacek> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Li Bin Liu <liliu> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.1 | CC: | gxing, liliu, ovasik, sgao |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | virt-who-0.11-3.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
Configuration file /etc/sysconfig/virt-who was world-readable.
Consequence:
Any user on the system might read passwords from the configuration file.
Fix:
Remove read permission for others from the file.
Result:
File is now only readable by root user. This affects only new deployments. For current deployments, it is advised to set the rights to 600 for /etc/sysconfig/virt-who file.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 10:23:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1088732 | ||
|
Description
Liushihui
2014-10-30 07:28:53 UTC
Fixed in virt-who-0.11-3.el7. Verified it on virt-who-0.11-3.el7.noarch. Steps to verify: 1.Check the permission of virt-who config file. it's 600 (rw-------) [root@hp-z220-06 sysconfig]# ls -alt virt-who -rw-------. 1 root root 1977 Nov 12 14:57 virt-who Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0430.html |