Bug 115992

Summary: CMS Developer guide (rhea-dg-cms-en-dev-1.pdf) incomplete
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Enterprise CMS Reporter: Arturo Dell <arturo.dell>
Component: documentationAssignee: ccm-bugs-list
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Daniel Berrangé <berrange>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: nightly   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-09-03 14:30:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Arturo Dell 2004-02-17 15:04:18 UTC
The CMS developer guide is missing a series of sections (too many to 
mention) where it says 'MORE NEEDED HERE'.

Comment 1 Daniel Berrangé 2004-02-17 15:08:27 UTC
We can potentially add information to the developer guide
ad-infinitum, but it wouldn't neccessarily be relevant to your
immediate needs. Could you specify any particular sections which are a
high priority for you to get further information on.


Comment 2 Arturo Dell 2004-02-17 15:17:34 UTC
This is an interesting dilemma. The author of the document is clearly 
stating 'MORE NEEDED HERE', that makes me think that there is content 
missing to cover the topic in discussion. I think ad-infinitum 
applies to a finished document when you want to improve it.

As a user I want as good a document as I can get so I would 
definitely say replace every instance of 'MORE NEEDED HERE' with 
content. I will ask other developers to help prioritise.

Comment 3 Brian Stein 2004-02-17 16:51:35 UTC
[Summary of conversation with Arturo]

All areas which contain "MORE NEEDED HERE" will be addressed before
the next release candidate.  Once you post your priority list here, we
can do our best to address the most important areas with extra care
and feeding.

As the documents were released before a final RC, the "MNH" comments
are to be expected.  Our documentation team focused on installation,
overall document structure, etc for the previous release.