Bug 116008

Summary: Only gives a partial listing of packages....
Product: Red Hat Web Site Reporter: R. Scott Baer <baer>
Component: OtherAssignee: Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: current   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/1/i386/os/headers/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-03-01 20:26:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description R. Scott Baer 2004-02-17 16:08:27 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET 
CLR 1.1.4322)

Description of problem:
When going to the stated URL to view rpms tha are included in the 
current relase of fedora, the list displays some, but then times 
out....
It get to the J's... I think the last one was joystick...

and of course I was looking for a perl mod.   


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to:  
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/1/i386/os/head
ers/

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tammy Fox 2004-02-27 06:29:24 UTC
This is because the list is so long. It takes a bit, but it all loads
for me. What type of connection are you using?

Comment 2 R. Scott Baer 2004-02-27 12:45:57 UTC
I tried this at home from a Road Runner account, and from work.. and
I'm not sure what type of connection we have there, but its at least
as fast as my RR account.   I did try this again this morning, and it
did load completely (took less than 15sec, I waited 1+ min the other
time)...  guess it could have been a combination of things..  traffic
from mydoom maybe.. it was all over the RR network, and at work.  

Sorry for the bogus bug report...

Scott

Comment 3 Tammy Fox 2004-03-01 20:26:29 UTC
No problem. I'm sure the number of connections, etc. had something to
do with it.